Monday, September 21, 2015

Spotify’s learnings

Over the past few months, Spotify demonstrated their need for a Chief Communications Officer or at least  a proper PR manager within the dominant coalition. I shall illustrate their lack of knowhow about strategic communication with one case and illustrate their learnings with another one.  

Logo







On the 15th of June, Spotify changed the color of its logo and had no idea of how much the recoloring would do to its users. Users were not fond of the new color, couldn’t appreciate the change without notice and in some cases thought that their phone was broken. According to Spotify’s chief designer, Tobias Schneider, the new color is part of a freshening of Spotify, to present itself less like a technology brand and more like a music brand. Surprisingly enough, the new color was known for months within the organization. You’d think this would lead to a more strategical approach of the communications around the change, but the opposite seems to have been the case. In hindsight, Schneider acknowledged that the absence of a notification prior to the change caused the fuss among users. In my opinion, Spotify lacked peering the recoloring with their external stakeholders and focused only on their internal stakeholders.

User agreements

On the 21st of August, Spotify got hit by another  shit storm of negativity after announcing the new user agreements. The NOS stated that a lot of people think the new agreements will violate their privacy and Telegraaf said Spotify was scrabbling to data. Basically, Spotify wanted access to users’ personal photo’s, video’s, locations and sensors. To me it seems that Spotify’s CEO (Daniel Ek) got word of Coombs (2007) situational crisis communication theory and applied it. On the 24th of August, Ek apologized deeply for the new and heavily criticized user agreements. In order to temper the public outrage, Ek offered his apologies on Twitter and through a blogpost.  A Few days after the apology, Spotify altered its privacy policy by adding additional information in an attempt to clarify the seemingly extreme policy.  By adding a new introduction, Spotify sets out clearly what data they collect and why.

Learnings?

For now the storm of protest has flowed away, but the question remains whether Spotify could have prevented these communication failures in the first place.  The way I see it Spotify could and should have prevented the second crisis by anticipating on the content of the privacy policy. If you’ve seen that a relatively small change of the logo produced such a big fuss, it is – in my opinion – incomprehensible that an organization presents  a hypersensitive privacy policy with such ambiguity.


Florian ter Voert 

4 comments:

  1. Spotify should have informed their clients prior to the change to prepare them for their change of logo. People might would appreciate the change of logo better if they were informed well about it. The thing about the user agreements is that I think transparency is the key. Spotify did make good use of the situational crisis communications theory and apologized and altered the agreements but they could think better about how people would react to these kinds of changes to prevent chaos and misunderstanding.

    Lennart Michels

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Glad to see that we share the same idea about how Spotify failed and could improve their communications!

    - Florian ter Voert -

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for your sharing. I realize a lot of useful things from this article. visit here :descargar spotify premium apk 2018

    ReplyDelete