Today we all suffer from increased flow of information that clogs up our brains. Not to mention cheap media, PR practitioners are responsible for a big part of what gets to our mental pipeline and gets stuck there. There are some serious calls from scholars addressing the gap between society and PR (which are often overshadowed by business practices, because who cares about those geeks in the labs, right?). Academia calls PR practitioners to be fair, responsible, and reflective, match organizational goal with needs of society and therefore serve it better (Porter, 2009). OK, but what does it really mean?
Brigitta
Brunner has addressed the issue, which is summarized as a need for civic
professionalism from the PR practitioners (Brunner, 2015). What makes the paper even more
interesting is the methodology used. The author interviewed PR practitioners
with extensive experience in the field. In other words, the author assessed
current status of the field in terms of civic professionalism.
This
short article says more than enough about faults of PR profession. It’s what we
all already know: information is usually being provided for the good of the organization
rather than public (not to mention common goal). Sure, PR specialists use a
very attractive surface logic of ‘we do care’, but seriously? It is quite obvious what makes
scholars concerned. While ethics of PR are something that’s usually defined,
civic professionalism is yet to be discovered.
And
that’s proved by the author. Many of interviewees thought that the concept of
civic PR profession is something that they would need to explain to their
colleagues, because it’s not very common to understand it. Moreover, they thought that many colleagues would see this as ‘not a part of
their job’. Scary, right? Although some said that if it was linked to their
organizational goals that might increase their interest. Which again leads us
to the beginning – organizational goals VS society.
But
what benefits can civic professionalism in PR bring to organizations? The
author names a few: it helps to build reputation, it helps to maintain
credibility, and it’s a chance to show that organization cares (which brings us
to two previous points). Organizations have capacity which is necessary to
voice problems and particular events in society that receive too little
attention. This does also foster a relationship between organization and society.
I strongly suggest that you look into this more. Even though I’m sure there are very little real civic PR examples (although there are). I therefore conclude that PR should pay attention to their publics not only as a source, target, enemy, or a friend, but as a counterpart in the same quest for truthful, credible and civic PR. PR should not mislead and use, but cooperate and produce the efficiently working society.
Karolis Damanskas
I strongly suggest that you look into this more. Even though I’m sure there are very little real civic PR examples (although there are). I therefore conclude that PR should pay attention to their publics not only as a source, target, enemy, or a friend, but as a counterpart in the same quest for truthful, credible and civic PR. PR should not mislead and use, but cooperate and produce the efficiently working society.
Karolis Damanskas
No comments:
Post a Comment